Abstract

Since 1977 negotiations over a continental shelf boundary have become further complicated by the establishment by both Norway and the Soviet Union of 200-mile economic zones. This development meant that future negotiations would be concerned not just with a continental shelf boundary but also with an economic zone boundary. Norway takes the view that the most appropriate practical method for effecting a delimitation is the median line. The Soviet Union takes the view that there are factors which indicate that a median line is not the appropriate method of delimitation. It was pointed out earlier that the Soviet Union has apparently argued that the continental shelf boundary should be a sector line. The actual line of longitude to which the Soviet Union refers was that used in a Soviet decree of 1926 to define the western limit of its claim to land territory in the Arctic.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.