Abstract
This article reports the first study ever published of the use of the word soul by a representative sample of members of the Evangelical Theological Society (ETS). All ETS members in New England were sampled. The response rate was 92%. ETS members generally avoid the word soul. Most think that spirit is an adequate replacement. Both terms refer to the inner or subjective person, which is not annihilated when the body dies. Two definitions of soul emerge: (a) the whole person (with the implication that the body is part of the soul), or (b) the inner or subjective person in the natural state (whether saved or unsaved). There is a holistic slant to biblical anthropology; a blurring of boundaries between body, soul, and spirit prior to death. Many theologians say they have not thought about the soul, and that theological anthropology is an underdeveloped and neglected aspect of evangelical theology.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.