Abstract

Sustainability is frequently discussed with reference to the “3-pillar” model distinguishing ecological, economic and social sustainability. However, social sustainability is treated as a residual category without adequate theoretical conceptualization. As a consequence, we find a wealth of approaches and models proposing a wide range of social indicators on individual and collective levels, both subjective and objective. While this diversity is fruitful given the range of social sciences involved and the diversity of social issues and social policies, communication between approaches and comparison of results is hindered by the lack of a common framework. The SOLA model offers an interdisciplinary, multi-level and comprehensive framework or meta-model structured by five modules (human ecology, 3 levels of social systems, ethical quality standards) which conceives social sustainability, social quality and quality of life in terms of evolving systems theory. We argue that the meta-model can facilitate systematic comparison of different approaches, bridge the gap toward natural and engineering sciences, and guide the development of social indicators. More specifically, two social indicator profiles are proposed to capture the divergence between two competing approaches to social sustainability: the social quality approach and the social capital approach. The focus in this article is on the presentation of the model and on conceptual issues of social sustainability and social quality. The model is based on an extensive review of alternative approaches. It is empirically validated in quality of life research in social and health care, and applied in on-going research on inclusive social policy.

Highlights

  • The ProblemSince the well-known definition of sustainability by the Brundtland-Commission (WCED 1987) the concept of sustainability has gained a prominent position in the political as well as scientific community

  • We propose the SOLA model, i.e. an instrument which is designed to order () social sustainability indicators and to support social indicator development in research and social policy

  • They are conceived in the model in a way that allows for generalising them to the normative level and the level of human ecology

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the well-known definition of sustainability by the Brundtland-Commission (WCED 1987) the concept of sustainability has gained a prominent position in the political as well as scientific community. Conceptual frameworks can have different objectives, The SOLA Model: A Theory-Based Approach to Social Quality and. The SOLA development started with empirical research on quality of care and quality of life in social and health care This resulted in an “umbrella” model of quality of life (QoL) suggesting a common framework for the diversity of current approaches (see below). The social quality approach (SQA) receives particular attention because the SOLA approach (abbreviation for social quality in Finnish) is indebted to this approach, and we want to continue with the objectives of the European Social Model and the Social Quality approach (SQA) as initiated by Beck, van der Maes, Walker and others (see Beck et al 1997; Van der Maesen and Walker 2012) Their approach is placed here into a wider framework with a new interpretation. A short conclusion will sum up and place the SOLA model in a social policy context

Central Concepts and the Architecture of the SOLA Model
Defining the SOLA Model
We might also consider more specific issues in a 4-dimensional framework:
The Theoretical Background of the SOLA Model
The Distinction of Levels in the SOLA Model
The Four Dimensions of the SOLA Model
Social Capital and Social Quality
The Social Capital Approach
The Social Quality Approach and the Social Quality Profile
In Conclusion: A Social Policy Perspective
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call