Abstract
Community is one of British sociology’s most enduring concepts and fields of study. Its history has been an uneven one, with periods of both vibrancy and dormancy. At one particularly low point Philip Abrams perceived that the concept of community was ‘slowly being evicted from British sociology’ (1978, p. 13). He was in a good position to judge, from his vantage point as editor of the British Sociological Association’s journal Sociology as well being as an established researcher in the field of community himself. His diagnosis of the travails of the field revolved around what he called the ‘paradox of the sociology of community’, namely ‘the coexistence of a body of theory which constantly predicts the collapse of community and a body of empirical studies which finds community alive and well’ (1978, p. 12). There was nothing uniquely British about this paradox, although Abrams’s (1968, 1981, 1985) knowledge of the history of British sociology gave him a sense of perspective of how this paradoxical situation had evolved in the British context. He was also well-placed to reflect on why in this context the concept of community that Robert Nisbet identified as ‘the most fundamental and far-reay’s unit-ideas’ (1970, p. 47) was so contested but also so resilient.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.