Abstract

A look at the research done so far on sign languages shows a focus on the so-called primary sign languages, i.e. sign languages that are acquired by Deaf people as their first language. There is a substantial amount of studies on sign languages around the world, e.g. AUSLAN in Australia, Deutsche Gebardensprache (DGS) (German Sign Language) in Germany, and American Sign Language in the States. More recently we note a diversification in sign language research, with an increase in sign languages other than the ones found in Western countries. We have studies on Jamaican Sign Language (Cumberbatch 2012), Mauritian Sign Language, (Gebert and Adone 2006, Adone 2012), Bhan Khor Sign Language (Nonaka 2012), Kata Kolok (de Vos 2012), Desa Kolok (Marsaja, 2015) among others. In spite of some effort to diversify the field, still very little is known on alternate sign languages. As these sign languages are underrepresented and under-documented in the field, we aim at providing some insights into these languages. This paper is organized as follows. In section two we attempt at distinguishing the various types of sign languages. In section three we give an overview of the sign languages in Arnhem Land as reported in the past and present. Section four describes the sociolinguistic contexts in which these alternate sign languages are used. Section five discusses some linguistic features shared by these alternate systems. Section six provides a brief conclusion and some thoughts for future research.

Highlights

  • A look at the research done so far on sign languages shows a focus on the so-called primary ZPNU SHUN\HNLZ PL ZPNU SHUN\HNLZ [OH[ HYL HJX\PYLK I +LHM WLVWSL HZ [OLPY ÄYZ[ SHUN\HNL There is a substantial amount of studies on sign languages around the world, e.g. AUSLAN in Australia, Deutsche Gebärdensprache (DGS) (German Sign Language) in Germany, and

  • In the case of these sign languages under investigation here, we believe the cultural component, the request for silence/ the inappropriateness of speech in certain contexts as well as the underlying principle of circumspection in Aboriginal interaction account best for the existence of these sign languages. Further factors such as IPTVKHS IPSPUN\HSPZT ILPUN KLLWS YVV[LK PU [OL J\S[\YLZ ^P[O [OL LɈLJ[ VM JVZWLLJO NLZ[\YLZ signs and modality switching being the norm of interaction, can certainly not be overlooked. ;OLZL MHJ[VYZ WSH H RL YVSL PU [OL ZVJPVSPUN\PZ[PJ WYVÄSL VM HS[LYUH[L ZPNU SHUN\HNLZ MV\UK in Arnhem Land

  • In this paper we set out to discuss the sociolinguistics of alternate sign languages found in Arnhem Land

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A look at the research done so far on sign languages shows a focus on the so-called primary ZPNU SHUN\HNLZ PL ZPNU SHUN\HNLZ [OH[ HYL HJX\PYLK I +LHM WLVWSL HZ [OLPY ÄYZ[ SHUN\HNL There is a substantial amount of studies on sign languages around the world, e.g. AUSLAN in Australia, Deutsche Gebärdensprache (DGS) (German Sign Language) in Germany, and Kendon WYVWVZLK [OPZ KPZ[PUJ[PVU [V KV Q\Z[PJL [V ZPNU SHUN\HNLZ HJX\PYLK HZ ÄYZ[ SHUN\HNLZ as compared to those that are used as an alternative mode of communication. This KPZ[PUJ[PVU WYLZ\WWVZLZ [OH[ [OLZL [^V [`WLZ HYL ZLWHYH[L [`WLZ 7YPTHY YLMLYZ [V [OL ÄYZ[ language, while alternate is used as an alternative to speech under special circumstances (Kendon 1988). This implies the language is learnt as a second language.

Small Community
Sociolinguistic Characteristics of Alternate Sign Languages of Arnhem Land
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call