Abstract
Studies of the relationship between child-rearing and moral development have been represented as supporting cognitive theories of the moral development process. These data have been misinterpreted, since cognitive developmental theory assumes the objective status of moral properties. The significance of the child-rearing studies is re-examined (Ss were 70 mothers and their five-year-old sons) through the application of a new conceptualization of "reasoning" to a study of the relationship between child-rearing and aggression-anxiety in five-year-old boys. In contrast to the notion that different types of moral view have different logical structures, empirical support is offered for the thesis that the difference between the "liberal" conscience and the "authoritarian" conscience reflects a difference in defense against hostile impulses.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
