Abstract

Even as local state officials and farm directors sought to “maintain the collectives, just in a different form,” reformers continued to envision the realization of a Jeffersonian dream in Eurasia. For advocates of land privatization, one path to modernization lay through the creation of yeoman farms. These farms would be similar to the family farms that, until the last decades of the twentieth century, had come to typify the North American landscape: small commercial agricultural companies managed by a single owner or group of owners. Private farming, instituted as a successor policy to the leasing brigades of the late 1980s and modeled in part on the Stolypin-era reforms of the early twentieth century, emerged prior to the fall of the Soviet Union and continued, parallel with the reorganization of collective and state farms, in independent Ukraine and Russia. The modest scale and success of the private farming movement did not equal the attention it initially received from both policy makers in Moscow and Kyiv and foreign observers. In the countryside, local state officials did not appear to share the dream they were charged with bringing to fruition, and the new class of market-minded, efficient peasant producers that would provide food for the cities did not emerge the way reformers hoped it would. During the 1990s, the Russian and Ukrainian governments issued multiple decrees and legislative acts to support the creation of private farms.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call