Abstract

Economics has recognized the importance of social networks for overcoming social dilemmas but has not yet developed a framework that allows to quantify its importance and define public policies in the presence of social interactions. This paper makes a first step in this direction by analyzing the influence that social networks and the state of a public good or common property resource have on compliance with social norms. The analysis signposts the maximal and minimal influence different types of social networks have for supporting a stable steady-state with full cooperation, thereby allowing policymakers to compare the effectiveness of legal (e.g., fines or subsidies) and informal (e.g., network-oriented) enforcement policies. The study also shows that social networks allow reducing the stringency of enforcement policies. Yet, cooperation is unlikely to prevail if the agents do not perceive the social dilemma as severe. We find that stable steady states where compliers and defectors coexist (partial cooperation) are supported and their stability depends on the type of functions representing social pressure and sanctioning costs. The analytical framework is employed for an empirical study of an aquifer in Spain. It reveals that subsidizing the compliers’ costs of social pressure may impede a stable steady state based on partial cooperation with a large area of attraction.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.