Abstract
In the years around 1800, Andrew Bell and Joseph Lancaster each developed schemes for the education of large numbers of students. Although the two have frequently been said to be virtually identical, I argue that they are substantially different. These differences emerge most forcibly in Bell’s and Lancaster’s different ways of representing students’ interchanges with one another and their alternative depictions of copying as a social and intellectual operation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
