Abstract

This study examines faculty motivation and quantitative performance in the research function. Beginning with industrial theory, factor analysis is used to characterize individual motivations to work in terms of distinctive sets of goals sought from employment. These bases of motivation (or 'work attachments) are surprisingly comparable to the range of attachments found in industry: Moral, Calculative and Alienative. Regression analysis indicates that Moral and Alienative attachments make an appreciable contribution to the explanation of research productivity. The results of this exploratory study suggest that further research should be undertaken to consider the manner in which faculty make sense of their situations and develop goals from work. There is also a need to study the relationship between work attachments and performance in other academic functions. Finally, it is suggested that the implications of research on work attachments be considered in relation to work design, compensation and development activities.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.