Abstract
<h3>To the Editor:—</h3> The device renews, at the adult level, the controversy over the relative merits and harm from the use of the pacifier vs the thumb as a source of oral gratification. Ours is not particularly a pacifier-oriented culture, as is the case in many European countries. Here we seem to accept the normal mechanism of thumb sucking for oral gratification in infancy. If this is to be carried over into "manhood," why not keep the same image; Dr. Friederici's device reminded us of a similar device made by the late Dr. Richard Cutter (Figure) extolling the thumb as the ultimate sucking device. This was made up in response to a comment in an article on psychodynamics in dentistry: I am often intrigued watching how pipe-smokers use the stem of their pipes; or more particularly, the choice of the shape of the pipe stem for one that resembles a
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
