Abstract
Four statistics which may be used to test the equality of population means are com-pared with respect to their robustness under heteroscedasticity, their power, and the overlap of their critical regions. The four are: the ANOVA F-statistic; a modified F which has the same numerator as the ANOVA but an altered denominator; and two similar statistics proposed by Welch and James which differ primarily in their approximations for their critical values. The critical values proposed by Welch are a better approximation for small sample sizes than that proposed by James. Both Welch's statistic and the modified F are robust under the inequality of variances. The choice between them depends upon the magnitude of the means and their standard errors. When the population variances are equal, the critical region of the modified F more closely approximates that of the ANOVA than does Welch's.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
