Abstract
This paper argues that a negative relationship between firm size and the likelihood of employees entering entrepreneurship could be driven by small firm employees acquiring specific human capital in industries where new business creation incurs lower entry costs. Contrary to the existing theories, this explanation on the small firm effect suggests a short-term rather than the persistent quality difference between entrepreneurs coming from large firms and those from small firms. To explore the plausibility of this alternative explanation, this paper examines the persistence of the small firm effect on new business survival and the founders’ post-entry occupational choice. Using employeremployee matched panel data obtained from Statistics Denmark, I find that the size of entrepreneurs’ prior employers continues to have a negative correlation with the survival of startups for the first three years, but the size effect gradually fades away afterwards. The magnitude of the correlation is largely reduced if the new businesses were formed in sectors that are unrelated to founders’ parent firms. Moreover, entrepreneurs coming from small firms are much more likely to move into unemployment if their first startups did not survive.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.