Abstract
It is proposed that the lithostratigraphic, biostratigraphic and chronostratigraphic categories currently recognized in the International Stratigraphic Guide should be expanded by an additional category, provisionally termed ecostratigraphy. This category would incorporate fossil subcommunities, communities, faunal and floral provinces, and biomes, to provide an ecologic counterpart to lithostratigraphy, and would help bridge the categories of lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy. It is also suggested that a hierarchy of terms in biostratigraphy would be useful, with formal recognition of subzones and superzones. Subzones may be defined as ‘zones within zones’, or short-lived biologic events in which one or a few species dominated communities, without permanently changing the benthos in the marine world. They therefore are equivalent in rank to fossil communities. Superzones are defined as correlative zones. If superzones were to be matched with substages (in biologic but not lithologic content), we would have a natural link between biostratigraphy and chronostratigraphy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.