Abstract
The significance of cultural heritage for state stability stems from its fundamental role for the communication of a specific collective memory, which forms the basis of collective identity. Cultural heritage may have implications for state stability in two major respects. First, the state itself needs to be based on a certain cultural heritage in order to gain legitimacy with state-actors. Secondly, the state needs to provide for stability by averting de-stabilising opposition from culturally heterogeneous non-state actors, who may exploit cultural heritage for political purposes by tying cultural heritage to certain identity markers. Tangible cultural heritage or cultural property consists of two groups of objects: movable and immovable ones. Movable objects are threatened by the removal from their countries of origin, i.e. by their illegal export. Public international law offers several legal instruments to protect the tangible cultural heritage from both kinds of threat. Keywords: collective identity; collective memory; cultural heritage; public international law; state stability; state-actors
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.