Abstract
Purpose: Bowel thickening, albeit a nonspecific finding on CT, may be related to significant bowel pathologies, such as neoplasm, inflammatory diseases, and ischemia. Although it has been previously described, its accuracy and clinical relevance remains uncertain. The objective of our study is to determine the importance of endoscopic evaluation in patients with incidental findings of thickened bowel wall on CT. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective study that analyzed patients who underwent colonoscopies for either abnormal small or large bowel CT findings. Patients with past medical histories that predisposed them to have bowel wall thickening, such as colon cancer, ischemic colitis, and inflammatory bowel disease, were excluded. Those with abnormal CT findings that were non-bowel related were also excluded. For patients who met the inclusion criteria of abnormal bowel wall thickening, any abnormal colonoscopic findings were biopsied and confirmed with histology. Results: We reviewed patients at Albany Medical Center from November, 2004 to March, 2006. Eighty-three patients with abnormal CT findings who underwent colonoscopies were identified. Of these, 34 patients were excluded due to either previous history of colon cancer, IBD, and ischemic colitis or abnormal CT findings that were unrelated to bowel wall thickening. Forty nine patients were included with incidental bowel wall thickening as the primary abnormality on CT who subsequently underwent endoscopic evaluation. There were 31 females and 18 males, ranging in age from 26 to 80. All abnormal endoscopic findings were biopsied and verified with pathology. Nine (18%) patients had ischemia, 7 (14%) had IBD, 5 (10%) had invasive carcinoma, 3 (6%) had diverticulitis, and 2 (4%) had nonspecific colitis. Normal colonoscopic finding comprised of 23 (47%). Conclusions: Our review shows that more than half of the patients with thickened bowel wall on CT had significant pathology. Therefore, any incidental finding of bowel wall thickening on CT should warrant further endoscopic examination.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.