Abstract

Beam steering is often encountered in laser diagnostic measurements, especially in flame environments, due to changes in refractive index caused by thermal and species gradients. It can negatively affect the accuracy of the results. In this work, the effects of beam steering on laser-induced incandescence (LII) measurements of pre-vaporized-liquid counterflow flames are assessed. The focus on counterflow flames is to facilitate future detailed experimental campaigns on one-dimensional nonpremixed sooty flames. It is found that the temperature and species gradients in the counterflow configuration have a much more significant impact on the beam profile than in laminar flat flames, especially for heavier fuels. As a result of the changes in the beam profile, for the same applied laser energy, the local fluence shifts markedly with fuel type, therefore, having a direct impact on the LII measurements. A procedure is developed for ensuring accurate measurements and it is shown that, for a specific fuel, it is possible to tailor the laser energy, such that the collected LII signal in the counterflow flames is nearly independent of beam-steering effects.

Highlights

  • The control of soot in flames requires understanding of its formation and oxidation

  • The relevance of beam-steering effects is evaluated based on the beam profiles obtained behind the McKennatype burner

  • The laser-induced incandescence technique is susceptible to beam steering

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The control of soot in flames requires understanding of its formation and oxidation. The further development of improved models of flames containing soot requires new measurements in well-controlled environments. The laser-induced incandescence (LII) technique is widely used for the in-situ and non-intrusive measurement of fv [5]. It has been applied in a range of laminar and turbulent, premixed, and nonpremixed flames [6,7,8,9], as well as in counterflow flames [10,11,12]. The LII technique has been extended to provide a measure of soot primary particle size, both at a single point [13, 14] and two-dimensional imaging [15, 16]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call