Abstract
Meta-regression is routinely used in the context of meta-analysis to assess the potential impact of covariates on the treatment effect. The limitations and pitfalls of this type of analysis have been documented, however, in particular, it has been claimed that the actual significance levels of the resulting tests can be higher than nominal levels. In order to examine the validity of this claim analytically, the distribution of meta-regression's standard test statistic, in the simplified scenario where the studies are the same size, is derived. The resulting significance levels can be used to give an indication of these more generally and it is found that relatively large numbers of studies are needed to provide actual significance levels that are sufficiently similar to the corresponding nominal levels. These findings can be used to inform those performing standard meta-regression hypothesis tests, so that they can avoid adopting the usual procedure in situations where this is likely to be inappropriate.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.