Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the effects of manual and interactive powered toothbrushes on periodontal status of patients during fixed orthodontic treatment. Materials and methodsThirty-six patients aged 12 to 18 years were included in this parallel design randomized clinical trial. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: manual toothbrushes (MT group) and interactive powered toothbrushes (PT group). The plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and bleeding on probing (BOP) scores were obtained before brushing (T0), 4 weeks (T1), 2 months (T2), and 4 months (T3) after brushing initiation. Periodontal measurements were performed by the same researcher that blinded to the groups’ randomization. Data were analyzed with Mann-Whitney U and Friedman tests for the comparison of parameters between groups and times. ResultsSignificant differences were found in PI values at all time intervals (P < 0.001), with one exception (T2-T3 in the MT group). The GI changes between timepoints were parallel to the BOP findings of the PT group. Both groups had significantly lower bleeding scores in both T0-T2 and T0-T3 time intervals (P < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in the bleeding score of PT group between T1-T3 time interval (P < 0.05); however, there were no significant differences between the groups at any timepoint. PI and GI scores were statistically decreased in the PT group compared with the MT group from baseline to 4 months (P < 0.05). ConclusionAll periodontal parameters decreased during the 4-month study period. The interactive powered toothbrushes may be an alternative to manual toothbrushes in terms of maintenance of periodontal health during fixed orthodontic treatment.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call