Abstract

This article argues that the content of the legal term “peaceful purposes,”as used in international space law is changing. Peaceful Purposes as understood throughout the bulk of the Space Age has encompassed not only the UN Charter’s prohibitions on the use of force, but also a number of customary international law principles that enhanced it beyond mere non-aggression. Through an examination of state practice with regards to the military uses of outer space, this article concludes that the legal content of peaceful purposes is eroding towards an alignment with “non-aggressive” as understood in the law concerning the use of force. Specifically, this article argues that geopolitical and technological changes are encouraging states to pursue disruption in the space environment rather than stability, and this has been matched with state practice and rhetoric that exhibits that states are moving toward more offensive, rather than defensive, stances in the space environment.

Highlights

  • A foundational legal concept in the use and exploration of outer space is that it should be for peaceful purposes

  • This article argues that the content of the legal term “peaceful purposes,”as used in international space law is changing

  • Through an examination of state practice with regards to the military uses of outer space, this article concludes that the legal content of peaceful purposes is eroding towards an alignment with “non-aggressive” as understood in the law concerning the use of force

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

A foundational legal concept in the use and exploration of outer space is that it should be for peaceful purposes. The notion of peaceful uses is almost universally held as a threshold legal requirement for space activities by space actors, the term lacks any clear definition. This is problematic as the content of the term is continually shifting as states develop new understandings of their own relationship to space security and overtime reinterpret the legal obligation. This paper will investigate how states currently understand the obligation to use space for peaceful purposes, and trace observation points that reveal the shifting notions of space security that affect the content of the legal obligation. This paper will look at the future challenges posed to the obligation in light of emerging technologies that undermine assumptions underlying an expanded scope of peaceful purposes

THE OBLIGATION OF PEACEFUL USES
WINDS OF CHANGE
DISRUPTION AND CONFLICT
PROXIMITY AND RENDEZVOUS OPERATIONS
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call