Abstract
Intra-partum (IP) surveillance of the unborn child by cardiotacography (CTG) monitoring is the commonest obstetric procedure in the developed world.(1) It is also the most medico-legally contested obstetric procedure in labour. In 2011, 'birth asphyxia' comprised 50% of the UK National Health Service (NHS) litigation costs,(2) and in the 2000-2010 decade, the same NHS paid out £3.1 billion for maternity medico-legal claims (the highest of any speciality), mostly involving cerebral palsy and CTG misinterpretation.(3) This article looks at a number of characteristics of IP CTG monitoring which argue for its questionable solidity of base in court proceedings.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
