Abstract

A daughter-in-law has no right in the property which is exclusively owned by her parents-in-law and further, such property of the parents-in-law is not a ‘shared household’ under the provisions of the DVA. As per the mandate of Section 2 (q) of the DVA read with the dictum of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Hiral P. Harsora & Ors V/s Kusum Narottamdas Harsora & Ors, the term “respondent” is to mean any person who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person and against whom the aggrieved person has sought any relief under the DVA.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.