Abstract
The myth that the political evolution of insular England was exceptional, and contrasted with that of continental Europe, is widespread in contemporary Anglo-American bourgeois historiography. The assertion that indigenous democratic traditions exist in England from remote antiquity, that the British always displayed extreme intolerance for despotism and absolutism, and that the British system of government, at all periods in its history, except for brief segments, was legal and constitutional is intensively propagated. As a supposed consequence of this, the general course of British history was allegedly moderate and calm, and marked by continuity, by the absence of sharp leaps and explosions. In the introduction to his recently published History of British Political Thought, Harrison proclaims that the British were always distinguished by restraint and by an inclination to compromise. As a result, class conflicts rarely played a decisive role in the life of the nation, unlike the situation on the cont...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.