Abstract

Hate crimes are crimes that are motivated by personal prejudice or bias. Hate-crime laws criminalise such conduct and allow for the imposition of aggravated penalties on convicted perpetrators. This article examines the historical, social and political factors which influenced the shaping and enactment of the first British hate-crime law. The South African context is also considered since the Department of Justice has recently released the Prevention and Combatting of Hate Crimes and Hate Speech Bill for public commentary and input.
 While Britain has had a long historical record of criminal conduct that was motivated by the race and the ethnicity of victims, it was only in the twentieth century that civil society first drew attention to the problem of violent racist crimes. Nevertheless, successive British governments denied the problem of racist crimes and refused to consider the enactment of a hate-crime law. Following a high-profile racist murder and a governmental inquiry, a British Labour Party-led government eventually honoured its pre-election commitment and passed a hate-crime law in 1998.
 Some parallels are apparent between the British and the South African contexts. South Africa also has a long historical record of racially motivated hate crimes. Moreover, in the post-apartheid era there have been numerous reports of racist hate crimes and hate crimes against Black lesbian women and Black foreigners. Despite several appeals from the academic and non-governmental sectors for the enactment of a hate-crime law, and the circulation for public commentary of the Prevention and Combating of Hate Crimes and Hate Speech Bill, such a law has hitherto not been enacted in South Africa. This article posits that the enactment of a hate-crime law is a constitutional imperative in South Africa in terms of the right to equality and the right to freedom and security of the person. While the enactment of a hate-crime law in South Africa is recommended, it is conceded that enacting a hate-crime law will not eradicate criminal conduct motivated by prejudice and bias.
 

Highlights

  • This article examines the factors that shaped the enactment of the first hatecrime law in the United Kingdom and includes a brief overview of its contents and interpretation

  • While the enactment of a hate-crime law in South Africa is recommended, it is conceded that enacting a hate-crime law will not eradicate criminal conduct motivated by prejudice and bias

  • Since dignity is a founding value of the South African Constitution[110] and a value that has informed the equality jurisprudence of the South-African Constitutional Court,[111] the enactment of a hate-crime law in South Africa should be regarded as a constitutional imperative in terms of the value of dignity and the right to equality

Read more

Summary

October 2017

How to cite this article Naidoo K "The Shaping, Enactment and Interpretation of the First HateCrime Law in the United Kingdom An Informative and Illustrative Lesson for South Africa "PER / PELJ 2017(20) - DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/17273781/2017/v20i0a1356

Introduction
Debunking a British myth
Post-Second World War Britain
Racial violence from the 1970s to the 1980s
The murder of Stephen Lawrence
Britain: preliminary conclusions
Background
77 See Adhikari Anatomy of a South African Genocide 39-44 and Matthias 1980
92 The recent public debate on hate speech commenced in January 2016 when Penny
The enactment of a South African hate-crime law: a constitutional imperative
Conclusion and recommendations
Literature
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.