Abstract

Porphyrin molecules are a widely exploited biochemical moiety, with uses in medicinal chemistry, sensing and materials science. The shape of porphyrins, as an aromatic unit, is reductively imagined to be approximately flat, with regular, rigid shape, owing to the popular depiction as a simplified skeletal model. While this regular conformation does exist, the array of substitution patterns in synthetic porphyrins or interactions with the apoprotein in biochemical moieties often induce distortions both in-plane and out-of-plane. Structural deviation reduces symmetry from the ideal D4h and can introduce changes in the physical and electronic structure; physical changes can introduce pockets for favorable intermolecular interactions, and electronic distortion can introduce new electronic transitions and properties. A quantification of porphyrin distortion is presented based on the Normal-coordinate Structural Decomposition method (NSD) pioneered by Shelnutt. NSD transforms crystallographically-determined atomic positions of each porphyrin into a summation of common concerted atom vectors, allowing for quantification of porphyrin anisotropy by symmetry. This method has been used previously for comparison of small data sets of synthetic and biological porphyrins. In the twenty-five years since the method was pioneered, the volume and variety of available crystal structure data has ballooned, and data analysis tools available have become more sophisticated, while the method has languished. Using modern data-science methods, clusters of porphyrin distortions are grouped to show the average effect that a substitution pattern has on porphyrin shape. Aiming to provide an overview on the shape and conformation of these key macrocycles we here provide context to the strategies employed for introducing porphyrin distortion and to provide a quantitative comparative basis for analysis of novel structures. This is achieved by demonstrating that porphyrin molecules often have a predictable NSD pattern, and therefore solid-state conformation, based on chemical arguments. This quantification allows for assessment of predicted structures and forms the basis of a symmetry-by-design motif for a range of porphyrinoids. A modernized computer program used in this structural determination is provided for analysis, with this treatise acting as a guide to the interpretation of results in new structure determinations. New features include simple report generation, prediction of symmetry and assessment of cluster behavior for a range of porphyrin moieties, as well as convenient plotting functions and data reductions.

Highlights

  • Tetrapyrrole molecules such as porphyrins (1), chlorins, bacteriochlorins and corrinoids are the colors of life – arguably the most widely known and exploited biochemical and synthetic macrocyclic chelate [1,2,3]

  • This review describes an approach to assessing specific porphyrin distortional profiles, using crystallographic data mining [73] in combination with data pretreatment by Normalcoordinate Structural Decomposition (NSD) [29], to quantify distortion in reported porphyrin molecules in the CCDC CSD 2020.1 [74]

  • Normal-coordinate Structural Decomposition method (NSD) is the quantification of porphyrin atom positions by transform of cartesian atom positions as into magnitudes of concerted deviation of all atoms along symmetry-banded normal-coordinate modes, allowing these quantified distortions to be compared

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tetrapyrrole molecules such as porphyrins (1), chlorins, bacteriochlorins and corrinoids are the colors of life – arguably the most widely known and exploited biochemical and synthetic macrocyclic chelate [1,2,3]. Well-developed synthetic modification techniques allow for introduction of a wide variety of modifications to the core and periphery of the macrocyclic systems (Fig. 1) [7,8,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. Simple synthetic porphyrins, such as (5,10,15,20-tetraphenyl porphyrinato)zinc(II) (1, M = Zn(II), [23]) or (2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18octaethylporphyrinato)zinc(II) (2, M = Zn(II) [24]), are highly symmetrical and approximately planar, as observed from crystal structure analysis.

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.