The serial transformation hypothesis of vertebrate origins: comment on “the new head hypothesis revisited”

Abstract

In "The New Head Hypothesis Revisited," R.G. Northcutt (2005. J Exp Zool (Mol Dev Evol) 304B:274-297) evaluates the original postulates of this hypothesis (Northcutt and Gans, 1983. Quart Rev Biol 58:1-28). One of these postulates is that the brain-particularly the forebrain-evolved at essentially the same time as many neural crest and neurogenic placode derivatives-including sensory ganglia, dermal skeleton and sensory capsules of the head, and branchial arches. Northcutt's subsequent paper in 1996 concluded with the idea that transitional forms might not have occurred at the origin of vertebrates. Butler proposed a "Serial Transformation" hypothesis in 2000, which disputed the latter idea in that paired eyes and an enlarged brain (but lacking telencephalon) were envisioned to have been gained before elaboration of most neural crest and neurogenic placodal derivatives. In 2003, J. Mallatt and J.-Y. Chen analyzed fossils of the Cambrian animal Haikouella, which strongly support its affinity to craniates and aspects of several hypotheses, including Butler's transformational model, because although branchial bars are present, most other neural crest and placodal derivatives are absent, while paired eyes and an enlarged brain (but probably without telencephalon) are present. A more complete picture of vertebrate origins can be realized when the various hypotheses are constructively reconciled.