Abstract

AbstractHuman–elephant conflict is a persistent problem across elephant home ranges, that results in economic damage to commercial and subsistence farmers, and physical harm and death to humans and elephants. This problem is likely to intensify with increased development, dwindling of natural habitats, and climate change‐driven environmental shifts. Various methods to mitigate human–elephant conflict have been employed, but to date these have been hampered by financial and logistical considerations. Based on the fact that African elephants are predated by lions and possess a remarkable sense of smell, we hypothesize that elephants are strongly averse to olfactory signals of lion presence, and that this can be utilized to create invisible barriers which elephants will not cross. We conducted a series of tests that show that lion dung is an effective deterrent of elephants. We conducted chemical analyses of lion dung and identified the main compounds. We then used synthetic mixtures containing these compounds, and show that they successfully elicit the deterrence effect, even in miniscule concentrations. These results indicate that elephants can be deterred using simple and low‐concentration mixtures based on available commercial products, that can be developed into products that offer a safe, sustainable, and cost‐effective method to mitigate human–elephant conflict.

Highlights

  • Human–elephant conflict occurs everywhere these taxa co-exist, and is a significant problem for both (Sitati, Melissa Schmitt and Kim Valenta contributed to this study.Walpole, Smith, & Leader-Williams, 2003)

  • Treatment effects fell into three distinct categories (Figure 2): (a) not significantly different from the water control trial, (b) intermediate hesitation, and (c) responses similar to those elicited by the feces of African elephant's main predator—the lion

  • It took an average of 22.45 ± 11.48 s for elephants to walk and step over (d) indole, and (e) dog feces. It took an average of 45.51 ± 49.64 s for elephants to step over the (f) cheetah feces, (g) phenol, (h) indole and phenol combined, and (i) lion feces. While these high risk odors all elicit similar responses from the elephants, the odor of lion dung had by far the most significant effect, which cannot be assessed via a statistical model: three elephants refused to step over the pipe, no matter how many oranges were offered, and one of these elephants chose not to participate in further trials after a single exposure to lion dung during trials

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Human–elephant conflict occurs everywhere these taxa co-exist, and is a significant problem for both While a great deal of research has focused on plantbased olfactory deterrence of elephants (Ernest & Robertson, 2019; Hedges & Gunaryadi, 2010; Schmitt, Shuttleworth, Ward, & Shrader, 2018), there has been a dearth of research on predator-based odors This is despite the fact that fear of predation is a universal and ancient mammalian motivator (Parsons et al, 2018), and scent strongly modulates memory and emotion (Takahashi, 2014). In the case of African and Asian elephants, despite their size, both species are at risk of predation by wild apex predators in their systems: lions (Panthera leo) in Africa, and tigers (Panthera tigris) in Asia It is siteand season-specific, African elephants can make up a significant portion of lion diets (Creel et al, 2018; Davidson, Valeix, Kesteren, Loveridge, & Hunt, 2013; Loveridge, Hunt, Murindagomo, & Macdonald, 2006; Power & Shem Compion, 2009; Wittemyer, Daballen, Rasmussen, Kahindi, & Douglas-Hamilton, 2005). This approach may yield a safe and cost-effective method to mitigate human–elephant conflict

| METHODS
| RESULTS
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call