The sensitivity of bipolar electromyograms to muscle excitation scales with the inter-electrode distance.

Abstract

The value of surface electromyograms (EMGs) lies in their potential to non-invasively probe the neuromuscular system. Whether muscle excitation may be accurately inferred from bipolar EMGs depends on how much the detected signal is both sensitive and specific to the excitation of the target muscle. While both are known to be a function of inter-electrode distance (IED), specificity has been of long concern in the physiological literature. In contrast, sensitivity, at best, has been implicitly assumed. Here we provide evidence that IED imposes a biophysical constraint on the sensitivity of surface EMG. From 20 healthy subjects, we tested the hypothesis that excessively reducing IED provides EMGs with limited physiological content. We detected bipolar EMGs with IEDs varying from 5 mm to 50 mm from two skeletal muscles with distinct architectures, gastrocnemius and biceps brachii. Non-parametric statistics and Bayesian hierarchical modelling were used to evaluate the dependence of the onset of muscle excitation and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on the IED. Experimental results revealed that IED critically affects the sensitivity of bipolar EMGs for both muscles-indeliberately reducing IED provides EMGs that are not representative of the whole muscle, hampering validity. Simulation results substantiate the generalization of experimental results to small and large electrodes. Based on current and previous findings, we discuss a potentially valid procedure for defining the most appropriate IED for a single bipolar, surface recording-i.e., the distance from the electrode to the target muscle boundary may heuristically serve as a lower bound when choosing an IED.