Abstract

Learning in a stochastic environment consists of estimating a model from a limited amount of noisy data, and is therefore inherently uncertain. However, many classical models reduce the learning process to the updating of parameter estimates and neglect the fact that learning is also frequently accompanied by a variable “feeling of knowing” or confidence. The characteristics and the origin of these subjective confidence estimates thus remain largely unknown. Here we investigate whether, during learning, humans not only infer a model of their environment, but also derive an accurate sense of confidence from their inferences. In our experiment, humans estimated the transition probabilities between two visual or auditory stimuli in a changing environment, and reported their mean estimate and their confidence in this report. To formalize the link between both kinds of estimate and assess their accuracy in comparison to a normative reference, we derive the optimal inference strategy for our task. Our results indicate that subjects accurately track the likelihood that their inferences are correct. Learning and estimating confidence in what has been learned appear to be two intimately related abilities, suggesting that they arise from a single inference process. We show that human performance matches several properties of the optimal probabilistic inference. In particular, subjective confidence is impacted by environmental uncertainty, both at the first level (uncertainty in stimulus occurrence given the inferred stochastic characteristics) and at the second level (uncertainty due to unexpected changes in these stochastic characteristics). Confidence also increases appropriately with the number of observations within stable periods. Our results support the idea that humans possess a quantitative sense of confidence in their inferences about abstract non-sensory parameters of the environment. This ability cannot be reduced to simple heuristics, it seems instead a core property of the learning process.

Highlights

  • Many animals, human adults and even human babies possess remarkable skills to cope with the pervasive uncertainty in their environment [1,2]

  • We evaluate the hypothesis that the brain acts as PLOS Computational Biology | DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi

  • We show that subjective confidence ratings varied across successive observations in tight parallel with a mathematical model of an ideal observer performing the optimal inference

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human adults and even human babies possess remarkable skills to cope with the pervasive uncertainty in their environment [1,2]. The human learning is sophisticated enough to quickly adapt to such higher-order changes: the probabilities and characteristics that subjects learn are adequately fitted by statistical models [4,5,6,7]. In such tasks and environments flooded with uncertainty, subjects estimate the characteristics of the outside world, they evaluate the degree of certainty that their estimates are accurate. This more subjective aspect of learning, the “feeling-of-knowing”, has received little attention so far. We attempt to provide a formal account of this feeling and its origin

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call