Abstract

Bacterial chemotaxis is often considered to be a textbook example of the rudimentary semiotic process. As such, it gives an excellent opportunity to better understand both semiosis and biology. Our study reviews this phenomenon in the light of up-to-date scientific knowledge to answer the most basic semiotic questions: what is the sign? What types of signs are there? What is the meaning understood on the molecular level, and by what means can it grow with time? As a case study, the bacterial chemotaxis toward glucose in E. coli species is chosen, and the semiotic framework of Charles Sanders Peirce applied. The analyses provide us with the following results: the sign, in its ultimate nature, is a general process. Bacterial chemotaxis can be understood in terms of Peircean type, symbol, and argument. The meaning on the molecular level is entirely pragmatic and, in this case, reduced to a bacterial response to glucose. A sign can grow through sign generalization, the emergence of different sign categories, the integration of these categories in functional cycles, and the introduction of contextuality. The sign of bacterial chemotaxis extends from the cell signaling pathways up to the population level. The presented results advance our knowledge of sign processing in the context of semiotic evolution.

Highlights

  • Semiotics, the science of sign, has a long and profound history

  • While for a long time the semiotics has been envisioned as restricted to the realm of human culture, the last several decades open a possibility of the presence of the signs in nature

  • Is the basic function of bacteria executed in a semiotic way? This paper aims to address this question

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The science of sign, has a long and profound history. As a part of logic, it provides the means of expressing the fundamental relations in the world (Bellucci, 2014; Martin, 1992). While for a long time the semiotics has been envisioned as restricted to the realm of human culture, the last several decades open a possibility of the presence of the signs in nature. How close is the relation between sign and life itself has to be yet discovered. Recognizing the sign communication among higher animals is straightforward, the problem, arises in the context of most primitive organisms apparently deprived of cognition, nervous system, or social structures. Is the basic function of bacteria executed in a semiotic way? This paper aims to address this question

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.