Abstract

When recording seismic ground motion in multiple sites using independent recording stations one needs to recognize the presence of the same parts of seismic waves arriving at these stations. This problem is known in seismology as seismic phase picking. It is challenging to automate the accurate picking of seismic phases to the level of human capabilities. By solving this problem, it would be possible to automate routine processing in real time on any local network. A new machine learning approach was developed to classify seismic phases from local earthquakes. The resulting model is based on spectrograms and utilizes the transformer architecture with a self-attention mechanism and without any convolution blocks. The model is general for various local networks and has only 57 k learning parameters. To assess the generalization property, two new datasets were developed, containing local earthquake data collected from two different regions using a wide variety of seismic instruments. The data were not involved in the training process for any model to estimate the generalization property. The new model exhibits the best classification and computation performance results on its pre-trained weights compared with baseline models from related work. The model code is available online and is ready for day-to-day real-time processing on conventional seismic equipment without graphics processing units.

Highlights

  • Published: 19 September 2021Phase picking is a routine task in the processing of local seismological monitoring data

  • To test the generalization property, we introduced two datasets that contain P and S waves recorded from local earthquakes in different regions of the earth

  • To test the performance of the transformer architecture, we developed a new model for phase classification of local earthquakes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Phase picking is a routine task in the processing of local seismological monitoring data. Improving the completeness of the earthquake magnitude catalog is a central goal of local seismological monitoring since a comprehensive catalog provides more information about the seismic regime. Another issue is the configuration of the seismic network. A wide variety of sensor types, site soil conditions, and levels of seismic noise can exist inside a single network. This can differ from one network to the next.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call