Abstract
Literature on personalization of politics emphasizes growing salience of individuals and private issues when party democracy is in decline. These trends are believed to strengthen personal appeal of politicians. However, what is the secret of party-leader’s personal appeal? Are politician’s personal traits the major key to popular sympathies? The article examines the impact of voter’s perception of party-leader’s personality along Big Five and personal charm on voter’s affinity for the leader. Analysis of the Lithuanian pre-election survey data (2012) on national party-leaders’ popular appeal, measured with “feeling thermometer”, and popular perception of leaders’ personality traits, measured with a set of semantic differentials, reveals that the significance of personality differs both across personality dimensions and between politicians under consideration. Agreeableness is the most important and universally desirable dimension of a political leader’s personality, followed by conscientiousness, with classic predictors of electoral choice under control. The significance of other personality dimensions of Big Five is much smaller if any, and personal charm seems to be inwrought with the five personality dimensions. The results prove that popular yearning for moral leadership, complemented with high performance, persists regardless of changes in political communication and (post)modern citizenship.
Highlights
IntroductionThe personalization of politics is a complex and multidimensional phenomenon that impinges on numerous sectors of democratic life (Poguntke & Webb, 2007; Wattenberg, 1991; Hermans & Vergeer, 2013; Langer, 2007, 2009; Meyer, 2002; Aelst, Sheafer & Stanyer, 2012; Corner & Pels, 2003; Jebril et al, 2013; Stanyer, 2012) including electoral behaviour, and popular predispositions towards politicians (Bean & Mughan, 1989; Kaase, 1994; Keeter, 1987; McAllister, 1996; King, 2002; Bittner, 2011)
What is the secret of political leaders’ personal appeal? This paper looked for the roots of leaders’ personal appeal in personality characteristics, as assessed by common voters
Do personality traits matter? How do they matter in the eyes of a citizen? The first conclusion of the Lithuanian case study is that the significance of personality, as an independent variable, differs both across personality dimensions and between politicians under consideration
Summary
The personalization of politics is a complex and multidimensional phenomenon that impinges on numerous sectors of democratic life (Poguntke & Webb, 2007; Wattenberg, 1991; Hermans & Vergeer, 2013; Langer, 2007, 2009; Meyer, 2002; Aelst, Sheafer & Stanyer, 2012; Corner & Pels, 2003; Jebril et al, 2013; Stanyer, 2012) including electoral behaviour, and popular predispositions towards politicians (Bean & Mughan, 1989; Kaase, 1994; Keeter, 1987; McAllister, 1996; King, 2002; Bittner, 2011). In the twilight of a mass democracy, the private and the personal are said to bridge the growing gap between the realm of politics and a present-day citizenry (Corner, Pels, 2003). The secret of personal appeal in political competition, including electoral campaigns, is yet to be revealed. Which characteristics in candidate’s personality are the key to success?
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
