Abstract

Objectives: To conduct a systematic review and narrative synthesis of interventions based on secondary use of data (SUD) from electronic prescribing (EP) and electronic hospital pharmacy (EHP) systems and their effectiveness in secondary care, and to identify factors influencing SUD. Method: The search strategy had four facets: 1. Electronic databases, 2. Medication safety, 3. Hospitals and quality/safety, and 4. SUD. Searches were conducted within EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL, and International Pharmaceutical s. Empirical SUD intervention studies that aimed to improve medication safety and/or quality, and any studies providing insight into factors affecting SUD were included. Results: We identified nine quantitative studies of SUD interventions and five qualitative studies. SUD interventions were complex and fell into four categories, with ‘provision of feedback’ the most common. While heterogeneous, the majority of quantitative studies reported positive findings in improving medication safety but little detail was provided on the interventions implemented. The five qualitative studies collectively provide an overview of the SUD process, which typically comprised nine steps from data identification to analysis. Factors influencing the SUD process were electronic systems implementation and level of functionality, knowledge and skills of SUD users, organisational context, and policies around data reuse and security. Discussion and Conclusion: The majority of the SUD interventions were successful in improving medication safety, however, what contributes to this success needs further exploration. From synthesis of research evidence in this review, an integrative framework was developed to describe the processes, mechanisms, and barriers for effective SUD.

Highlights

  • Hospitals have a variety of data available within electronic prescribing (EP) and electronic hospital pharmacy (EHP) systems

  • This review provides an overview of Secondary Use of Data (SUD) for quality and safety of medication use, through systematic description and synthesis of the limited evidence base within this area

  • Our analysis explores the definitions of SUD used in current research and describes the context and key features of reported SUD interventions, including the types of EP/EHP systems used, the types of data used and the design of the SUD intervention itself, including the secondary users of the data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hospitals have a variety of data available within electronic prescribing (EP) and electronic hospital pharmacy (EHP) systems These data have considerable potential to be re-used to improve patient care and drive quality improvement [1]. It is not known whether the data held within EP and EHP systems are currently being used effectively to support improvement in medication quality and safety, or the factors affecting its use. Previous research has suggested that SUD could drive improvement within healthcare, preventing reinvention and/or duplication of data for clinical research purposes while reducing resource costs, and potentially facilitating sustainability of improvement as the data are readily available [3,4,5]. Bradley et al suggest that feedback is most effective when: 1. data are perceived to be valid by receivers, 2. the credibility of the data is established, 3. the source and timeliness of data is clear to receivers, 4. the feedback provides performance benchmarking, 5. feedback is provided by leaders, 6. feedback is personalised and 7. sustained over time [1]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call