The secondary patency after patch venoplasty versus balloon venoplasty in management of neointimal hyperplasia of the venous anastomosis of thrombosed arteriovenous grafts for hemodialysis

Abstract

Background The pathogenesis of neointimal hyperplasia associated with hemodialysis arteriovenous (AV) grafts is complex and likely involves surgical manipulation of the tissues, material biocompatibility, and mechanical factors. Both surgical and radiological interventions for stenosed and thrombosed AV graft have been described aiming at the optimal restoration of morphology and function. Aim To compare the secondary patency after patch venoplasty and balloon venoplasty in management of neointimal hyperplasia of the venous anastomosis of AV graft for dialysis. Patients and methods This is a double-armed randomized prospective study that was carried out at Ain Shams University hospitals for 2 years. A total of 20 patients with thrombosed synthetic AV graft were enrolled in this study. The first group (10 patients) was treated with patch venoplasty, and the second group (10 patients) with balloon venoplasty adjunctive after surgical thrombectomy. Results Graft patency at 6-month and 12-month follow-up was 90 and 70% for the balloon angioplasty group versus 60 and 40% for the surgical patch venoplasty group (P=0.3 and 0.37, respectively). Conclusion In the present study, the outcome of balloon venoplasty was better than and patch venoplasty for thrombosed AV grafts. In addition to better graft patency, balloon venoplasty offers the advantage of shorter operative time and lower morbidity. Further studies with a large sample size and multicentric cooperation are required to confirm the present findings.