Abstract
I estimate, using hand-collected data, a model of strategic corporate fraud that incorporates and quantifies firms' adjustments to fraud propensities in response to their expectations of regulators' information processing capacity. The findings are economically significant. With a one standard deviation change in different regulatory interventions, 10 to 58 additional fraudulent cases are committed each year. I exploit the 2005 option backdating scandal as an exogenous shock to regulatory attention, and find further support for both opportunism in fraud and the SEC's deterrence effect. Heterogeneity in fraud driven by executive incentives and firm complexity is documented.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
