Abstract
Anecdotally there are many mammographers that experience musculoskeletal discomfort, although it does not feature highly in the published literature. The aim of the present project was to reduce musculoskeletal discomfort and pain associated with mammography, through examining ways of improving posture and thereby reducing muscular loading. The poster demonstrates how we evaluated our working practice with the support of ergonomic professionals, in order to reduce high-risk techniques and postures. Our evaluation led to a radical change in the way our mammographers undertake the examination. The present project has demonstrated the importance of examining our own working practice, seeking informed professional advice and being willing to change or adapt our techniques to minimize long-term health implications.
Highlights
Breast-sparing oncoplastic procedures (BSOP) offer a predictive marker guiding use of anti-oestrogen therapy, and radical new alternative to mastectomy and conventional breast- expression profiling appears to select patients more or less likely to conserving surgery in early breast cancer treatment
The aim was to document attitudes to male radiographers and the effect on the programme performance parameters through a postal questionnaire completed by 85.8% of a random sample of 2,000 women recently screened by BreastCheck
Nine per cent would not have proceeded if the radiographer was male; 17.5% agreed that ‘If there were male radiographers I would not return for another screening appointment’; and 18.3% were unsure
Summary
Breast-sparing oncoplastic procedures (BSOP) offer a predictive marker guiding use of anti-oestrogen therapy, and radical new alternative to mastectomy and conventional breast- expression profiling appears to select patients more or less likely to conserving surgery in early breast cancer treatment. We have compared the results of screening with analogue and digital technology over our first 2 years, in terms of recall rates, cancer detection rates and positive predictive value, and found no overall significant difference in any of these parameters. Abnormalities are graded as A, B or C at consensus by the radiologists and reporting radiographers depending upon the mammographic likelihood of cancer and biopsy This means that patients can be allocated to one of our three assessment clinics and at specific times within those clinics to facilitate workflow. Methods A retrospective analysis of all breast cancer patients with recurrence who had completed 5 years of follow-up was performed. Infection control is not routinely included in the quality assurance process of all units
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
