Abstract

The post-war conflict over Trieste has been seen as significant by second-generation studies1 for two main reasons. It is seen as a test case of the early Cold War and later as a microcosm of the Cold War. So a source of conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union (at least up to the split between Tito and Stalin in June 1948), and at the same time the battlefield of a domestic Cold War. At any rate, the issue is recognized as a minor issue rather than a major point of observation of the Cold War, as the first-generation studies preferred to see it.2 The second-generation studies have found, in US diplomatic history, the framework that was previously lacking, and have been strongly influenced by post-revisionist historiography. So the crisis of May–June 1945 has been portrayed as the first confrontation between the ‘Riga axiom’ and the ‘Yalta axiom’ or as a prologue of containment (the sources of inspiration of these interpretations are Daniel Yergin and John F. Gaddis respectively).3

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.