Abstract
The rising demand for policy-relevant impact indicators is a product of two relatively recent developments: the success of science indicators in monitoring the achievement of intrinsic (cognitive) goals of science, combined with the advent of political initiatives that seek to improve the performance of science in attaining extrinsic (social) goals of science. The search for policy relevant impact indicators, while it will continue to benefit from scholarly research in social studies of science, presupposes an appropriate accounting scheme that facilitates the organization of impact indicators. One such accounting scheme—the social knowledge system (see Holzner et al., this volume)—has demonstrated its practical utility by drawing us closer to a programmatic goal of the National Science Foundation: the establishment of a system of social impact of science (SIS) indicators (see Dunn et al., this volume) that improves our understanding of science and the way it affects the world around us.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
