Abstract
The article examines the evolution of B. Eichenbaum’s attitude to Acmeism. The author is particularly interested in Eichenbaum’s early years as a writer and literary critic, especially in his articles that appeared in the Russkaya Molva newspaper in 1912–1913, which have only recently attracted scholarly attention. One of such articles is reprinted here for the first time. Eichenbaum’s publications are interpreted in the context of his works and hitherto unstudied content of Russkaya Molva. The negative treatment of the newspaper by Soviet historians of journalism and literature was predetermined by Lenin’s scathing criticism of the periodical. In reality, however, Orlova’s analysis proves that the newspaper had every right to call itself progressive and politically unbiased. In his polemic with Acmeists, likely guided by B. Sadovskoy, Eichenbaum sides with the latter’s assessment of the poetic movement. He contrasts Acmeists’ output with that of the French poet F. Jammes. Over time, however, Eichenbaum revises his attitude towards Acmeist poetry, especially Akhmatova’s, and later Gumilyov’s, works.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.