Abstract

Until very recently, little guidance existed as to the application of the Agreement on Technical Barriers of Trade (TBT Agreement). Through the reports in three disputes in 2012, US - Clove Cigarettes, US - Tuna II and US - COOL, the Appellate Body (AB) provided important and controversial insights regarding the interpretation of the TBT Agreement. Among other matters, the AB shed light on the precise scope of this Agreement. The authors argue that recent WTO case law broadened the scope of the TBT Agreement by establishing the limits of technical regulations, providing further enlightenment to the understanding of standards and leaving room for the inclusion of process and production methods (PPMs) under the purview of the TBT Agreement.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.