Abstract
In spite of the conclusion in Chapter 2, French law distinguishes between national contracts, governed by purely domestic law, and international contracts governed by the domestic version of the Convention.1 The French legislature began to prepare legislation applicable to national and international contracts alike, legislation intended to embody the substance of the Convention in a form appropriate to French law; it would be strange if the state which introduced the Protocol option had not done so. Yet, two laws were passed, that of 9.4.1936 containing the exact terms of the Convention, and that of 2.4.1936 (L36) modelled on the Convention but differing from it both in form and in substance.2 It is probable that the latter law only was originally intended, but that the final draft differed too greatly from the Convention for it to be regarded as the Convention in appropriate national form.3 The differences were partly due to the demands of French shippers,4 and partly to the inability or reluctance of French lawyers to adapt the Anglo-Saxon concepts which dominate the Convention.5
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.