Abstract

Modern business international transactions are multiparty and complicated. Such contracts are usually composed of several contracts which can contain bilateral dispute resolution arrangements. According to the principle of parties autonomy dispute arising between two persons bound by an arbitration agreement in connection with a multiparty project will be resolved by arbitration exclusively between these two parties. Other parties cannot participate in the resolution of the dispute through arbitration, even if they have played an active role in the actual project. Notwithstanding any legitimate interest, they might have the outcome of the dispute; these parties will remain alien both to the arbitration proceedings and an arbitral award. Their interests are not taken into consideration and left unprotected. Arbitration proceedings, unlike litigation, usually do not bear any intervention or joinder of parties, which is explained by the contractual nature of arbitration. Thus, the binding power of an arbitral award extends only over parties of an arbitration agreement. Meanwhile, an arbitral award can affect interests of third parties. How can these parties defend their interests in arbitration proceedings and during recognition and enforcement proceedings in national courts? There are two ways of resolving such problem in state court litigation. The first one is the compulsory participation of any third party with any legitimate interest in litigation through intervention, joinder of parties, and consolidation of cases. A court ex officio has to gather all parties that can have any legitimate interest in resolving the dispute. If judgment affects any interest of a party that was not involved in the proceedings judgment should be reversed in appellate court. The second way is also the solution against parallel proceedings. This way is to harmonize the outcome of parallel proceedings by the principle of lis pendens and res judicata. The paper examines the binding and res judicata effects of the arbitral award towards third parties through the Russian and international experience of defending of interests of third parties in international arbitration and litigation.

Highlights

  • Modern business international transactions are multiparty and complicated

  • The second way is the solution against parallel proceedings. This way is to harmonize the outcome of parallel proceedings by the principle of lis pendens and res judicata

  • It is worth to be mention that the idea of only procedural nature of the judicial decision and arbitral award is peculiar to the modern German legal science (as the judicial decision could not have any substantive effect on the third party and such party could not have any right to challenge this decision by any means but by bringing separate special claim (Art. 772 of the German Civil Procedure Code40))

Read more

Summary

Res Judicata and Legal Power of Judicial Decisions of State Courts

The doctrine of res judicata is well established in the common law jurisdictions of England, Ireland, Canada, India, Australia and New Zealand. In civil law countries, we usually distinguish legal power (effect) of a final judicial decision (force de chose jugée, materielle Rechtskraft). From the substantive theory of a decision, the binding effect of the judicial decision in the civil case is considered as all subjects on the territory of the Russian Federation are obliged to coordinate their behavior in according to the conclusion of the court concerning the legal relation stated by him.. If in considering the dispute, the court will come to other conclusions than those contained in the judicial act in the case between the creditor and the guarantor, he must indicate the relevant reasons In theory, such idea is justified by the principle of “respect for the conclusions of the court contained in an earlier legally enforceable act.” Formally, such judicial decision would not have any prejudicial effect, as it fails the triple test (same parties). The seller who does not participate in the case would have no right to prove the wrong conduct of the case by the buyer

Legal Effect of Arbitral Awards
The Effects of an Arbitral Award towards Non-Participating Third Parties
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call