Abstract
By examining the diversity of philosophies of science, the assumption that there is a single scientist—practitioner model is questioned. A variety of philosophies of science are reviewed and the modes of practice and training that flow from the different approaches are considered. The conclusion is drawn that to use the term scientist—practitioner without identifying the associated philosophy of science permits individuals and institutions to obscure fundamentally different (and sometimes incompatible) approaches to psychology.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
