Abstract

Abstract This chapter turns to sources of uncertainty in the science of consciousness and emotion. To have a science of consciousness at all, we need reliable ways of disentangling conscious and unconscious processing. In the case of vision, long-running debates about blindsight epitomize two major problems: the criterion problem and the problem of confounders. These problems arise even more strongly in the case of valenced experience, since methods for eliciting unconscious analogues of valenced experiences are less mature. In the absence of secure ways of dissociating valenced experience from its unconscious analogues, two rival pictures of the neural basis of valenced experience are likely to persist. On one picture, valenced experience wells up directly from subcortical mechanisms without the need for further cortical processing. On the other, subcortical circuits produce coordinated behavioural responses, but conscious experience only comes with cortical involvement. Unfortunately, current evidence does not allow us to choose confidently between these pictures.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.