Abstract

In recent decades, cognitive and behavioral knowledge in dogs seems to have developed considerably, as deduced from the published peer-reviewed articles. However, to date, the worldwide trend of scientific research on dog cognition and behavior has never been explored using a bibliometric approach, while the evaluation of scientific research has increasingly become important in recent years. In this review, we compared the publication trend of the articles in the last 34 years on dogs’ cognitive and behavioral science with those in the general category “Behavioral Science”. We found that, after 2005, there has been a sharp increase in scientific publications on dogs. Therefore, the year 2005 has been used as “starting point” to perform an in-depth bibliometric analysis of the scientific activity in dog cognitive and behavioral studies. The period between 2006 and 2018 is taken as the study period, and a backward analysis was also carried out. The data analysis was performed using “bibliometrix”, a new R-tool used for comprehensive science mapping analysis. We analyzed all information related to sources, countries, affiliations, co-occurrence network, thematic maps, collaboration network, and world map. The results scientifically support the common perception that dogs are attracting the interest of scholars much more now than before and more than the general trend in cognitive and behavioral studies. Both, the changes in research themes and new research themes, contributed to the increase in the scientific production on the cognitive and behavioral aspects of dogs. Our investigation may benefit the researchers interested in the field of cognitive and behavioral science in dogs, thus favoring future research work and promoting interdisciplinary collaborations.

Highlights

  • The domestication of wolves was probably the first human successful attempt aimed to control an animal

  • The first goal of the present paper was to verify whether the dog cognitive and behavioral studies were attracting the interest of scholars more than the studies on cognitive and behavioral sciences in general

  • It is clear from our data that scientific production for dog cognitive and behavioral studies is substantially more consistent in “recent analysis”, as compared with “earlier analysis”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The domestication of wolves was probably the first human successful attempt aimed to control an animal. Several studies demonstrated that keeping dogs has a positive effect on our physical and mental health (Levine et al 2013; Ownby et al 2002; Raina et al 1999; Kramer et al 2019). This so-called “pet effect” (Allen 2003) received some criticism, noting that some papers reported null or negative effects on health and happiness of pet owners (see Herzog 2011 for a review), it contributed to the flurry of research on dogs

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call