Abstract

BackgroundSchistosomiasis control mainly relies on preventive chemotherapy with praziquantel (PZQ) distributed through mass drug administration. With a target of 260 million treatments yearly, reliably assessing and monitoring efficacy is all-important. Recommendations for treatment and control of schistosomiasis are supported by systematic reviews and meta-analyses of aggregated data, which however also point to limitations due to heterogeneity in trial design, analyses and reporting. Some such limitations could be corrected through access to individual participant-level data (IPD), which facilitates standardised analyses.MethodologyA systematic literature review was conducted to identify antischistosomal drug efficacy studies performed since 2000; including electronic searches of the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialised register and the Cochrane Library, PubMed, CENTRAL and Embase; complemented with a manual search for articles listed in past reviews. Antischistosomal treatment studies with assessment of outcome within 60 days post-treatment were eligible. Meta-data, i.e. study-level characteristics (Schistosoma species, number of patients, drug administered, country, etc.) and efficacy parameters were extracted from published documents to evaluate the scope of an individual-level data sharing platform.Principal findingsOut of 914 documents screened, 90 studies from 26 countries were included, enrolling 20,517 participants infected with Schistosoma spp. and treated with different PZQ regimens or other drugs. Methodologies varied in terms of diagnostic approaches (number of samples and test repeats), time of outcome assessment, and outcome measure (cure rate or egg reduction rate, as an arithmetic or geometric mean), making direct comparison of published data difficult.ConclusionsThis review describes the landscape of schistosomiasis clinical research. The volume of data and the methodological and reporting heterogeneity identified all indicate that there is scope for an individual participant-level database, to allow for standardised analyses.

Highlights

  • Despite its heavy burden worldwide, schistosomiasis remains a neglected tropical disease (NTD) which fails to attract enough attention from research and funding bodies to generate novel drugs and diagnostics [1,2]

  • This review describes the landscape of schistosomiasis clinical research

  • Albendazole has not shown efficacy against Schistosoma spp., it was included in the keywords for search in order to better identify studies performed by the soiltransmitted helminthiases (STHs) community which may have looked at schistosomiasis aside of their major study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite its heavy burden worldwide, schistosomiasis remains a neglected tropical disease (NTD) which fails to attract enough attention from research and funding bodies to generate novel drugs and diagnostics [1,2]. Individual-level participant data (IPD) for meta-analyses would circumvent some of those limitations and allow harmonisation of relevant variables and analyses [9,10], enabling more meaningful analyses and comparisons across individuals or studies This could unravel yet unknown aspects of drug efficacy and safety, in specific populations and over time. Recommendations for treatment and control of schistosomiasis are supported by systematic reviews and meta-analyses of aggregated data, which point to limitations due to heterogeneity in trial design, analyses and reporting Some such limitations could be corrected through access to individual participant-level data (IPD), which facilitates standardised analyses

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call