Abstract
The paper makes the analysis of the recent Supreme Court verdict pertaining to the Law on Atrocities which has remained the bone of contention for some time now and which has erupted a renewed debate and subsequent protests in India. The argument that this paper wants to make is that the Judgment in Subhash Kashinath Mahajan Case which prompted the widespread criticism as well as protest appears to be a misplaced application of the law and that it raises genuine questions relating to the application of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Atrocities Act and the judicial protection of these communities.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
