Abstract

BackgroundClassic ecological formulations of predator–prey interactions often assume that predators and prey interact randomly in an information-limited environment. In the field, however, most prey can accurately assess predation risk by sensing predator chemical cues, which typically trigger some form of escape response to reduce the probability of capture. Here, we explore under laboratory-controlled conditions the long-term (minutes to hours) escaping response of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus, a key species in Mediterranean subtidal macrophyte communities.MethodsBehavioural experiments involved exposing a random sample of P. lividus to either one of two treatments: (i) control water (filtered seawater) or (ii) predator-conditioned water (with cues from the main P. lividus benthic predator—the gastropod Hexaplex trunculus). We analysed individual sea urchin trajectories, computed their heading angles, speed, path straightness, diffusive properties, and directional entropy (as a measure of path unpredictability). To account for the full picture of escaping strategies, we followed not only the first instants post-predator exposure, but also the entire escape trajectory. We then used linear models to compare the observed results from control and predators treatments.ResultsThe trajectories from sea urchins subjected to predator cues were, on average, straighter and faster than those coming from controls, which translated into differences in the diffusive properties and unpredictability of their movement patterns. Sea urchins in control trials showed complex diffusive properties in an information-limited environment, with highly variable trajectories, ranging from Brownian motion to superdiffusion, and even marginal ballistic motion. In predator cue treatments, variability reduced, and trajectories became more homogeneous and predictable at the edge of ballistic motion.ConclusionsDespite their old evolutionary origin, lack of cephalization, and homogenous external appearance, the trajectories that sea urchins displayed in information-limited environments were complex and ranged widely between individuals. Such variable behavioural repertoire appeared to be intrinsic to the species and emerged when the animals were left unconstrained. Our results highlight that fear from predators can be an important driver of sea urchin movement patterns. All in all, the observation of anomalous diffusion, highly variable trajectories and the behavioural shift induced by predator cues, further highlight that the functional forms currently used in classical predator–prey models are far from realistic.

Highlights

  • Classic ecological formulations of predator–prey interactions often assume that predators and prey interact randomly in an information-limited environment

  • Trajectories from control urchins ranged from normal diffusion (Brownian motion) to marginal ballistic trajectories (Figs. 2c and 3a,b); while most of the sea urchins from the predators treatment displayed strongly superdiffusive or nearly straight-lined motion

  • Suggest the opposite: Paracentrotus lividus sea urchins showed complex movement behaviour in information-limited environments, with a wide range of variability between individuals, while this variability was constrained as soon as information became available. Despite their old evolutionary origin (Echinoidea first appeared in the Ordovician) [19, 20], lack of cephalization [21], and homogenous external appearance, the trajectories that sea urchins displayed in information-limited environments ranged from Brownian motion to superdiffusion, and even marginal ballistic motion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Classic ecological formulations of predator–prey interactions often assume that predators and prey interact randomly in an information-limited environment. Most prey can accurately assess predation risk by sensing predator chemical cues, which typically trigger some form of escape response to reduce the probability of capture. Prey organisms have evolved a variety of antipredator strategies to enhance their probability of survival in the face of predation. These adaptations may reduce the probability of encountering a predator, or. Most prey are capable of accurately assessing predation risk [2], some of them using multiple predator detection mechanisms—including visual, chemical and/or tactile cues. In the case of early predator detection, avoidance (e.g. refuge seeking) is among the most common responses, but when the attack is inevitable or already initiated, the most common strategy is to reduce the probability of capture by escaping [5]. Antipredator behaviour, is a typical example of how an animal needs to rapidly integrate information from its environment to produce an appropriate behavioural response that is constrained by the animal’s body condition, biomechanics, and information processing capabilities [5]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call