Abstract

The purpose of the article is to identify the problems of creativity of directors who have realized their artistic potential both in auteur cinema and in the space of the stage and to determine scientific guidelines that will contribute to a comprehensive analysis of the phenomenon of the filmmaker in the performing arts. Research methodology. Methods of scientific analysis, comparison, generalization, self-analysis of the artist were used in the elaboration of the theme. In addition, analytical and systematic methods were applied in their unity, which is necessary to study the art aspect of the problem. The scientific novelty of the study is to determine the universality of directing as a specific kind of artistic and aesthetic activity; in clarifying the interaction of performing and screen arts in the use of expressive means; in determining the features of the filmmaker's activity in the stage space through the adaptation of screen means in theatrical productions, which first became the subject of a special study; in the coverage, the activities of directors-authors who resorted to reforming the language of language and the language of stage production; in identifying the original principles of filmmaking and specific means of cinematic expression, which not only found a direct embodiment in films and contributed to the emergence of outstanding authorial films but also had a significant impact on the author's theatrical direction, which sought to visualize stage images. Conclusions. It is proved that the stage work of filmmakers-authors calls into question the theoretical postulates about the perniciousness of the intrusion of theater culture into screen works. It has been found that pictorial and expressive means provide a chronology of image creation (long shots, in-frame editing, acoustic, light, and shadow effects), the use of which in cinema is considered a high degree of skill, have their origins in the performing arts. Keywords: director-author, stage space, directing means, theater, screen.

Highlights

  • Comparison, generalization, self-analysis of the artist were used in the elaboration of the theme

  • Analytical and systematic methods were applied in their unity, which is necessary to study the art aspect of the problem

  • Фасбіндера розкрито опертя майстра в сценічній діяльності на принципи кінематографічного реалізму; виявлено прагнення у постановках драматичних театрів документальності й художньої образності, яка слідує з побутової вірогідності; визначено стремління митця до справжності фактур, достовірності обстановки і речей на сцені; висвітлено колективний (як у кінематографі) характер творення вистави; показано дотримання митцем в екранних постановках театральних законів єдності місця, часу і дії; з’ясовано, що майстрові було притаманне написання авторських п’єс як кіносценарію з властивим йому схематизмом і мінімізацією психологічних обґрунтувань

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Висвітлити особливості творчості кінорежисера-автора в просторі сцени та визначити специфіку виражальних засобів сценічного мистецтва в екранних творах.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.