The safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic off-clamp tumor evacuation versus traditional nephron-sparing surgery for large (>4 cm) sporadic renal angiomyolipomas

Abstract

BackgroundOff-clamp nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) have been selectively performed in renal tumors in which the majority are T1a (<4 cm) renal caners. Less is known, however, whether off-clamp is a safe and effective option for treatment of Sporadic Renal Angiomyolipomas (RAML), especially in those >4 cm. The objective of our study was to compare the perioperative and renal function outcomes of a novel off-clamp tumor evacuation technique versus conventional laparoscopic NSS for the treatment of large sporadic RAMLs (>4 cm). MethodsFrom January 2021 to June 2022, 42 patients diagnosed with RAML were prospectively randomized to receive laparoscopic standard NSS (Group 1) and off-clamp tumor evacuation (Group 2). The surgical and postoperative outcomes of both groups were compared. ResultsBaseline characteristics demonstrated no discernible variation between Group 1 and Group 2. Compared to Group 1, Group 2 was associated shorter operative time (92.5 vs 82.3 min, p < 0.001), elimination of warm ischemic time (22.9 vs 0 min, p < 0.001), more blood loss (92.6 vs 161.9 ml, p = 0.02), and lower short-term renal function reduction of the operated kidney (17.2% vs 9%; p < 0.001). Neither major complication nor recurrence occurred. ConclusionIt seems that transperitoneal laparoscopic off-clamp tumor evacuation is a feasible and safe option for the treatment of RAML, with the added benefit of preserving renal function to a greater extent than the traditional methods.